Held in Constantinople in 381 AD, the Second Ecumenical Council is one of the most significant councils in the history of the Christian Church. This council sought to address, clarify, and expand on the issues that emerged following the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea. By examining the key outcomes, theological implications, and lasting legacy of the Second Ecumenical Council, we can better appreciate its vital role in shaping the Eastern Orthodox faith.
4 minutes
Historical context: A need for unity
After the First Ecumenical Council, the Church affirmed the full divinity of Jesus Christ in the Nicene Creed. However, Arius’ teaching that Christ was a created being and not truly God continued to gain traction. This led to increased theological and political conflict within the Church.
The Nicene Creed laid an important foundation for the Christian Faith. But further elaboration was necessary due to the rise of heresies concerning the nature of the Holy Spirit. Determined to unify the empire and root out these heresies, Emperor Theodosius I convened the Second Ecumenical Council. Approximately 150 bishops gathered, primarily from the eastern provinces, to address the issues facing the Church.
Outcomes of the Council
1. The expanded Nicene Creed was expanded to include a clearer definition of the Holy Spirit’s nature. The newly composed creed declared the Holy Spirit as “the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father.” This was crucial in combating many heresies that minimized the role of the Holy Spirit, as it affirmed the co-equality of all three Persons of the Trinity.
2. The council unequivocally condemned various heresies, including Arianism, Eunomianism, Apollinarianism, and Macedonianism, among others. Some of these heresies questioned the divinity of Christ, and others that of the Holy Spirit.
3. Perhaps the most controversial aspect of this Council was Canon III, which elevated the bishop of Constantinople to the status of Ecumenical Patriarch. This elevation granted the bishop primacy within the eastern Church, second only to the bishop of Rome. Indeed, Constantinople was referred to as the New Rome, a name which both Rome and Alexandria resented.
4. This council underscored the importance of conciliar governance in the Church. In other words, doctrinal decisions should emerge from consensus among the bishops. This model is still in place today in the Orthodox Church, with authority distributed equally among the collective body of bishops.
Theological implications
The adaptations to the Nicene Creed reaffirmed the Church’s understanding of the Trinity: the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are consubstantial and coequal, One God in Three Persons.
Orthodoxy often emphasizes the transformative power of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer and the Church. The Church’s understanding of His role in divine revelation and the sacramental life of the Church serves as the cornerstone of our theology and worship.
Lasting legacy of the Second Ecumenical Council
The decisions made during the Second Ecumenical Council established critical tenets that inform Orthodox belief, practice, and community life today. We recite the revised Nicene Creed during every Divine Liturgy as a reminder of our commitment to the Truth. Secondly, our Church uses its conciliar governance model to foster ongoing dialogue among the bishops. Such governance is vital, especially today, as the Orthodox Church navigates contemporary doctrinal challenges. And finally, Constantinople retains its unique position as a center of orthodoxy within the Eastern Orthodox tradition, emphasizing the importance of maintaining unity and communion among the various Orthodox jurisdictions around the world.
A Council for the Ages
The Second Ecumenical Council serves as a critical milestone in the history of the Eastern Orthodox Church. It not only addressed the immediate theological controversies of its tie, but also laid the groundwork for a unified understanding of the Christian faith that continues to resonate in Eastern Orthodox spirituality and ecclesiastical structure today. As Orthodox Christians look back at this council, we recognize it as a testament to the power of conciliar governance and the Holy Spirit’s guiding presence in the ongoing journey of faith. The legacy of this council reinforces the essential call for unity and truth within the Church, enduring as a beacon for contemporary believers navigating their own theological and spiritual challenges.
Keep Reading: